Note: from our President John Carroll
I have highlighted those parts of this report which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no one has ever seen before. It also highlights the inequity of the Nominal Roll, where Army personnel, who served pre the official dates of involvement, have their service recognised, whereas the RAN member is not recorded on this Roll or acknowledged anywhere else at all. Another fault of the Senior Service also being the Silent Service. I can only hope things have improved over the years. I have left that part of Chapter Three of Out of Sight, Out of Mind in so that the new portion can be read in context with that part of the Chapter.
Early Days - RAN - South Vietnam War Zone
It was via a narrow twisting channel through dense mangrove swamp
that ships passed from the South China Sea to the piers and moorings
of Saigon. Mines in the
channel could put an end to that traffic.
The area through which the channel made its way was known as the
Rung Sat Special Zone (RSSZ), a dangerous four hundred square mile
expanse of mangrove swamps and mudflats.
[i]
Long Tao Shipping Channel – Rung Sat Special Zone
[ii]
As an integral part of Australia’s policy of forward defence, the
RAN was fully involved. Effectively, not only was the Navy’s
presence in Vietnam much more significant from a defence perspective
than is often assumed, it also began at a much earlier stage than
the other two services, and several years before the first thirty
Australian Army advisers arrived in Vietnam in August 1962,
purportedly in non-combatant roles.[iii]
Historical theses of the Australian military deployment in
Vietnam rarely, if ever, mention that RAN ships visited South
Vietnam in the mid 1950’s and early 1960’s. While serving with the
FESR based in Singapore, during the Malayan Emergency, the
destroyers Anzac and
Tobruk both made separate
visits to the then South Vietnam capital city port of Saigon in
October 1956, and December 1957 respectively. Visits then followed
to the ports of Nha Trang and Saigon, undertaken by
Vampire and
Quickmatch on 25 January
1962, ostensibly to mark the occasion of Australia Day, followed by
similar visits to Saigon by the two frigates,
Quiberon and
Queenborough on 31
January 1963. These visits,
per se, were officially classified as diplomatic port visits by
the Australian Government, with their sole purpose being hailed as
demonstrating Australian support for South Vietnam, which had been
embroiled in armed conflict with a range of anti-government forces
since its inception in early 1955.[iv]
Unofficially, Vampire and
Quickmatch were also
given the covert task of accurately assessing the viability of a
ship the size of Sydney
being able to access the port of Saigon, for the troop
transportation and logistical support roles in which she would
subsequently be employed.
The berthing facilities had been used by at least two light
French aircraft carriers and several American auxiliary aircraft
carriers in the past; and the port was reportedly readily accessible
to ships drawing 9.3 metres (30 feet) and up to 180 metres (590
feet) in length.[v]
Sydney was known to
exceed these dimensions by over forty feet (12 metres) at the load
water line (LWL) and by more than 100 feet (30 metres) in length
overall (LOA). Both factors would have affected
Sydney’s
ability to manoeuvre in the restrictive confines of the narrow,
twisting Long Tao shipping channel.
Despite the diplomatic classification for these visits, by 1962 it
was quite evident that both
Vampire and Quickmatch
were exposed to some considerable risk when they entered the
Long Tao shipping channel, and made their way up the Saigon River
system. Captain Anthony Synott, then the Commanding Officer of
Vampire, later wrote
that:
In January 1962, HMAS Vampire
under my command visited Saigon in company with HMAS
Quickmatch. There is no
doubt that Vietnam was on a war footing at the time and we were
required to take all necessary precautions.[vi]
Commander Peter Doyle, Commanding Officer of the accompanying
frigate, HMAS Quickmatch,
confirmed the circumstances of the visit, and wrote in some detail
of the task he was delegated to perform by Synott:
In essence, the task delegated to me by the Commanding Officer of
HMAS Vampire was to
report on the feasibility of HMAS
Sydney being able to
berth in Saigon. In preparation of my report I used:
* French charts of the Saigon River.
* Discreet discussions with local pilots – a small US carrier had
berthed in the Saigon River probably
near the refinery oil storage area about a year before.
* Discussions with Colonel Hopton the Australian Defence Attaché.
* My observations of the river passage both inward and outward.
* From recollection, I believe my report concluded that from a
purely pilotage and ship handling point of
view – at least as far as the oil storage refinery, HMAS
Sydney could navigate the
Saigon River. However, the possibilities of mine warfare, swimmer
attack and shellfire from the countryside made the risks
unacceptable.[vii]
This element of risk and danger applied not just to the ships
involved, but also to the officers and sailors who ventured ashore
on official duty. The observations of Lt. Cdr. Peter M Cumming show
a first-hand perspective.[viii]
Cumming visited South Vietnam during the period, 14 December 1962 to
14 January 1963, as an RAN observer. At the time, he was the
Executive Officer of HMAS
Quiberon, which was scheduled to visit South Vietnam in late
January 1963.
Following official briefings and introductions, Cumming met with
Captain J B Drachnik, USN, head of Navy section, Military Assistance
Advisory Group (MAAG), and formulated a program to cover the period
of his stay, until planned amphibious landings against enemy forces
in the south commenced early in January 1963. As Cumming noted:
As the plans for the landings had reached draft form there was
nothing I could do to assist, and I therefore decided to use the
rest of December familiarising myself with the proposed operation,
visiting as much of SVN as possible, assisting the Australian
Defence Attaché (ADA) with arrangements for the RAN visit in
January, and generally observing activities naval, in and around
Saigon.
[ix]
On Tuesday 18 December, Cumming met with Lt. Cdr. Liem at
the Ministry of Defence, followed by Captain Ho Tan Quyen, Commander
of the VNN at Naval Headquarters, who briefed both Colonel Hopton
and Cumming on the forthcoming Ca Mau landings. On the following
Saturday, he accompanied Hopton to the graduation ceremony at the Da
Lat Military Academy. On Boxing Day, he was shown over the Saigon
shipyard and inspected the new command junks being constructed
there.[x]
The next day, Cumming flew to Da Nang via Pleiku. He was briefed on
activities in the north at HQ One Corps by VNN and MAAG
representatives there, and met with Lt. Trang, the district naval
commander. He then met with Captain P Young and the men of the USN
Seal Team stationed at Da Nang. Next day, in company with the local
USN advisor, Lt. Ryan, Cumming visited the resident US Marine
helicopter flight and discussed the area with their Intelligence
Officer (IO). That afternoon, he was taken to the naval base on an
island at the entrance to Tourane Harbour, and observed the training
of the Biet Hai (Sea Force Commandos). From there, Cumming returned
by air to Saigon.[xi]
At 0700 on New Year’s Day 1963, Cumming joined VNN LST 500 at the
Saigon shipyard, slipping from alongside at 0800 to commence the
WAVBROLO campaign. Also onboard were Captain Quyen, Captain Drachnik,
Colonel Moody USMC, and other USN advisors, plus VNN staff officers
and communications personnel. All told, a total of 700 marines and
120 naval personnel were embarked, with a full complement of stores,
filled sandbags, fresh water, and assault boats. Passage down river
was interesting but uneventful, anchoring at Vung Tau at 1300,
approximately 1.5 miles north of Banc de Phare, Can Gio, where
practice landings of marines at Can Gio were undertaken, using one
command junk, five junks and the LST’s four Landing Craft.[xii]
At 1900, LST 500, in company with VNN LSM’s 403 and 328, proceeded
via the western side of Puolo Condore (Con Son) Island to an
anchorage off Ca Mau Point, which was reached at 2200 on Wednesday 2
January. Here,
the force was joined by two LCU’s and 15 junks from Phu Quoc Island.
The extensive shoaling off Ca Mau Point forced the flotilla to
anchor some four miles offshore, with choppy seas making boat-work
extremely difficult.[xiii]
The landing of the southern battalion at 0800 the next day
went as planned. Air support was provided and an underwater
demolition team had cleared and reconnoitred the beaches before the
landings, which were not opposed.
As Cumming noted ‘All villagers had disappeared from Xom Mui
and Xom Rach Tau, leaving only the usual booby traps, grenades and
stakes behind. All river mouths in the area were heavily barricaded
with stakes.’[xiv]
Regarding the landings, Cumming also wrote:
All landing on the 3rd went well, the only casualties
being one KIA and 2 WIA in the northern landings due to a land mine.
Immediately the marines had been landed, which required two lifts by
junk and LCVP and final approaches by 15 ft. SSB’s with outboard
engines, the job of offloading stores to the beaches commenced and
continued all the next day. All fresh water had to be supplied by
the ship.
PM 4th, I landed at Xom Mui with Captain Drachnik and was
grateful for borrowed khaki clothing and weapons. The village is up
a tidal creek, built on stilts, and surrounded by nauseous mangrove
swamps. … I returned to
the LST by SSB and junk that evening. Captain Quyen brought Lt.
General Cao, Commander IV Corps, and the civilian provincial
governor aboard for the night.
Fifth and 6th I spent onboard, where Captain Quyen had
his command post until a site could be found ashore. On the 6th
an LCM was attacked going upstream in the northern sector by Viet
Cong (VC) guerrillas using an electrically detonated mine. The LCM
was missed, but was ambushed when it withdrew and two sailors were
wounded. Positive results up to that date were occupation of initial
objectives, clearing traps and defences, and the capture of some 50
suspect civilians. Quite a large amount of VC equipment was also
taken.
I joined LSM 403 on the evening of the 6th, and we sailed
at midnight for the northern area. We arrived off the Bo De river
mouth at 0800/7th, and on being joined by LCU 539 and
533, we entered the river at 1100. All guns were manned, as the VC
is active on both banks, which are only 150 yards apart. We anchored
inside the entrance and sent civil guard platoons ahead to join
Rangers clearing VC from the village at the entrance to Rach Duong
Keo. At 1230, we
beached near the village where VC elements were being driven away
with small arms fire, but with no discernible casualties, as we came
in.
At 0730 Tuesday 8th, I left LSM 403, landed my gear at
Nam Can, and left by LCM to visit the area of the northern landings.
We arrived at the village of Xom Ong Trang at 1300, the passage was
unopposed. VC controlled villages on the southern shore were
apparently deserted. However, the LCM had been fired on the day
before, and had replied with tracer, burning down a long house. We
stopped all craft on the river while on passage, searched them and
interrogated their occupants.
I managed to hitch a ride on an ARVN H34 helicopter and left Nam Can
at 1230 Wednesday 9th. The alternative was to wait for a
charcoal convoy leaving on the 10th and taking three days
to fight its way up the canal to Ca Mau, with safe and timely
arrival NOT guaranteed. I decided to take my chances with the
Vietnamese chopper pilot instead.[xv]
Cumming returned to Quiberon
via Saigon and Singapore, and remained in the ship until 21
February. It appears that Cumming’s service in Vietnam has not been
acknowledged in any official documentation. His name and service
details do not appear on the Vietnam Veterans Nominal Roll, as do
153 of the 220 members of the ship’s company of HMAS
Quiberon. Whereas Colonel
Hopton, the Australian Defence Attaché who accompanied Cumming for
the initial part of his visit, has had his name and service details
recorded on this Roll.
[xvi]
In late January 1963, the frigates
Queenborough and
Quiberon were deployed to
the South Vietnam ports of Nha Trang and Saigon from their duties
elsewhere in the Southeast Asian region.[xvii]
While at Nha Trang, a group of twenty sailors from each ship
landed to visit the Vietnamese Army’s Ranger training centre at Duc
My - approximately 50 kilometres from Nha Trang. The Commanding
Officer of Quiberon,
Commander Vernon Parker noted in his ROP for January that: ‘It was
obligatory for all personnel to be armed as ambushes by the Viet
Cong are by no means uncommon in the area.’[xviii]
Lieutenant Commander Frank Woods Commanding Officer of
Queenborough, later
confirmed Parker’s observations, and noting in his ROP that:
During the four-hour passage up the Saigon River an armed patrol
craft and spotter aircraft to detect signs of threat from the river
bank were provided. After berthing at Saigon 24-hour security
measures were provided to both ships by South Vietnamese
authorities.[xix]
When Vampire and
Quickmatch made their
‘Australia Day’ visit to the South Vietnam port of Saigon on 25
January1962, they entered what could only be termed an active ‘war
zone’. From an official government point of view, however, this was
not the case. Australia’s official involvement is recorded as
beginning upon the arrival of ‘Colonel F P Serong in Saigon on 31
July 1962, and that this date marks Australia’s entry into the
Vietnam War.’
[xx] But even official versions
of events can sometimes be incorrect. As Serong has noted in some
detail:
My first arrival in Vietnam was mid-April 1962. At that time, the
war was fully ongoing. Passage up and down the river, to and from
Saigon by warships was a tactical operation conducted as such – an
operation of war. This had been the long ongoing status at that
date, and, from my later knowledge, for many months before.
[xxi]
Sound judgement also dictates that RAN ships entering a restricted
waterway - in what could best be described as an area of strategic
importance and likely to be subject to an unprovoked attack at any
time - would need to adopt proven defensive measures commensurate
with the conditions then faced. The fact that Synott had ordered
such defensive measures be adopted aboard
Vampire and
Quickmatch for the
four-hour transit of the Long Tao shipping channel, both going
upstream and when coming back down, indicates that a real threat of
risk and danger did exist.[xxii]
That this state of affairs was apparently ongoing is
confirmed by Serong in his letter. The date of Australia’s official
involvement in Vietnam however, remains the same.
A prudent assessment made by Synott regarding the conditions he
faced before ordering that an advanced state of defensive measures
be adopted when entering the Long Tao shipping channel, had
obviously not been considered when the relevant authorities
allocated starting dates for the ‘official’ commencement of
Australia’s involvement in Vietnam. It would also be safe to assume
that the government of the day placed more diplomatic and political
value on the deployment of 30 non-combatant Army advisors to South
Vietnam, seeing them as an example of their support to a beleaguered
SVN government - and their US supporters. They were much more
visible than the arrival of two warships, purportedly on a port
visit to Saigon six and a half months previously, that were also
there to discretely ascertain the viability of
Sydney using the port
later, to support the further involvement of Australian forces in
the rapidly developing war.
It was into this rather inhospitable area that
Sydney and her escort
ventured repeatedly from June 1965 until November 1972, where they
were always assigned to the northern end of the Vung Tau anchorage.
These anchorage points were adjacent to Point Gahn Rai light, well
within mortar and rocket range of Long Son Island, Can Gio on the
Long Thahn Peninsula, and other places of opportunity within
striking distance of the Vung Tau anchorage, from where communist
forces could attack ships without warning.
[i]
Frank Uhlig Jr., ‘Fighting Where the Ground Was a Little
Damp: The War on the Coast and in the Rivers’, in, Frank
Uhlig Jr. Vietnam The
Naval Story, (Maryland: Naval Institute, 1986), p. 270.
[ii]
Texas Tech University (TTU), Vietnam Virtual Archive, Long
Tao Shipping Channel, RSSZ, Map Series 1501.
[iii]
Peter Edwards & Gregory Pemberton,
Crises and
Commitments: (Sydney: Allen &
Unwin,
1992), p. 243. Alastair Cooper, in David Stevens (Ed.),
The Royal Australian
Navy: The Australian Centenary of
Defence,
Vol. 3, (Melbourne: Oxford, Melbourne, 2001, p. 203.
[iv]
Jeffrey Grey, Up Top:
The Royal Australian Navy & South East Asian Conflicts
1955-1973, (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1998), pp. 72-74.
[v]
Victor Croizat, The
Brown Water Navy: The River & Coastal War in Indo-China &
Vietnam, 1948-1972, (Dorset:
Blandford Press, 1984), p. 31.
[vi]
Letter from Admiral Sir Anthony M Synott, via Roger deLisle,
24 April 1993.
[vii]
Letter from Rear Admiral Peter H Doyle, via Roger deLisle,
20 May 1994.
[viii]
Lt. Cdr. Peter Maxwell Cumming RAN O263.
[ix]
‘Visit to the Republic of South Vietnam 14 Dec. 1962-14 Jan.
1963’, Report by Lt. Cdr. P M Cumming RAN, 14 Jan. 1963,
addressed to Flag Officer Commanding Australian Fleet, Flag
Officer Commanding Far East Fleet, CO HMAS
Quiberon,
Australian Defence Attaché Saigon.
[x]
Ibid
[xi]
Ibid
[xii]
Ibid
[xiii]
Ibid
[xiv]
Ibid
[xv]
Ibid
[xvi]
Temporary Brigadier Leslie
Irvine Hopton is recorded on the Nominal Roll of Vietnam
Veterans as having 748 days’ service as the Australian
Service Attaché, Saigon, from 01-01-1961 to 18-01-1963. And
yet Australia’s date of official involvement in the Vietnam
War is not until 31 July 1962. While Cumming served within
the officially designated involvement times, his name and
service details are not recorded on the Nominal Roll.
[xvii]
HMAS Quiberon,
Log Book, SP 866/1, Bundle 922, January 1963, NAA. HMAS
Queenborough, Log
Book, SP 866/1, Bundle 921, January 1963, NAA.
[xviii]
Report of Proceedings, HMAS
Quiberon, AWM 78
299/5, January 1963.
[xix]
Letter from Cdr Frank R Woods, via Roger deLisle, 24 June
1994.
[xx]
Ian McNeill, To Long
Tan: The Australian Army & the Vietnam War 1950-1966,
(Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1993), p. 42
[xxi]
Letter from Brigadier Francis P (Ted) Serong, via Roger
deLisle, 17 February 1999.
[xxii]
HMAS Vampire Log
Book, SP 805/1, Bundle 901, January 1962, NAA. The two ships
assumed Condition Yankee from 0305 to 0848, 25 January 1962,
and from 0815 to 1245, 29 January 1962. Condition Yankee is
only assumed in peacetime in dangerous circumstances e.g.,
fog or mines.